UPDATE 1-Australia Westpac chair says board “devastated” by money laundering claims


Business News - Opportunities - Reviews



SYDNEY (Reuters) – Westpac Banking Corp (WBC.AX) has implemented additional transaction monitoring, its chairman said at the Australian lender’s annual shareholder meeting on Thursday, seeking to mollify investors angered by a money laundering scandal.

FILE PHOTO: A woman walks past an illuminated logo for Australia’s Westpac Bank in Sydney, Australia, September 6, 2017. REUTERS/Steven Saphore/File Photo

“As a Board and as individuals, we are devastated that anyone may have been exposed to the risk of harm as a result of a failing by Westpac. For this, we are truly sorry,” said Chairman Lindsay Maxsted, who brought forward his retirement in light of the scandal.

Westpac, grappling with the scandal and accusations of enabling child exploitation payments, could see investors vote against its proposals on executive pay and the re-election of a long-serving director.

But Australia’s oldest and second-largest bank is unlikely to see its board ousted at the annual shareholders’ meeting as institutional investors are not in favor of such a move, investors and analysts said.

“We acknowledge we should have implemented more robust transaction monitoring earlier than we did. This would have generated more suspicious matter reports to AUSTRAC,” Maxsted said in a statement filed to the exchange.

He also said that actual payment of either all or part of the 2019 variable rewards would be withheld for the full executive team subject to the assessment of accountability for AUSTRAC’s claims

Westpac was sued by Australian regulators three weeks ago, who cited 23 million breaches of anti-money laundering laws, in the country’s biggest ever such scandal. Westpac has said it accepts most of the regulator’s assertions, and its CEO and compliance chief have also subsequently quit.

The bombshell lawsuit, as the country was still digesting a damaging financial misconduct inquiry, has sent Westpac’s shares down 8% in the three weeks since it was announced, wiping A$7.7 billion off its market value. The bank could pay a fine of more than A$1 billion ($678.60 million), analysts have said.

“It will be a long meeting with many shareholders venting their anger,” said Carol Limmer, who monitors Westpac for retail investor lobby group Australian Shareholders Association, which plans to vote against the bank’s executive pay.

“Some shareholders would be concerned at the impact on the share price and also future dividends. Some would be horrified at the child exploitation aspect,” Limmer added in an email.

A vote against the pay proposals for top executives on Thursday would make Westpac the biggest Australian company where such proposals have been rejected for two years in a row.

Under Australian law, if more than a quarter of shareholders vote against a company’s executive pay at back-to-back annual meetings, they may hold another vote at the meeting to remove the whole board. That “board spill” motion requires support from 50%.

Fund managers say more than a quarter of shareholders may vote against Westpac’s executive pay because of grassroots outrage over the payments scandal, but institutional investors will use their muscle to prevent a board spill.

Australia’s big banks are mostly owned by large institutions, with individual shareholders making up a small portion of their overall share register.

Proxy adviser CGI Glass Lewis has said it will support the executive pay proposals while media reports said rival proxy adviser Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) is recommending a vote against the proposals. ISS did not respond to a Reuters request for comment.

Some investors and groups, including the Shareholders Association and several pension funds, have said they will vote against the re-election of Peter Marriott, who has been on the Westpac board since 2013.

Reporting by Byron Kaye in Sydney and Aby Jose Koilparambil in Bengaluru; Editing by Muralikumar Anantharaman and


Business News - Opportunities - Reviews



Leave a Reply